Popular Soccer Fitness Tests

soccer fitness test examples

Did you know 83% of goals in German pro play are set up by at least one powerful action like a sprint or jump? That fact shows how short bursts decide matches and why measuring those efforts matters.

Field assessments give coaches real, game-like data without heavy lab gear. They capture sprints, changes of direction, and short recoveries—the actions that lead to goals and game-winning plays.

Want tests that actually map to on-field demands? We focus on simple setups you can run on a standard field and use across preseason and the regular season.

Practical, low-cost, and sport-specific—these protocols let teams compare players fairly, shape training blocks, and track true match readiness.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

  • High-intensity bursts, not steady runs, shape match outcomes.
  • Field-based assessments reflect real game actions and are easy to run.
  • Proper testing links numbers to pressing, sprints, and late-game efforts.
  • Use results to individualize training and compare players objectively.
  • Simple equipment and clear protocols make repeated testing practical.

Why intermittent, soccer-specific testing beats “The Mile” for players today

Matches are messy: short bursts, pauses, direction changes—and a good test must mirror that chaos. Elite women’s play shows typical work-to-rest patterns of ~4 seconds high intensity, then 44–64 seconds of low effort (Gabbett & Mulvey, 2008). That pattern is what matters on the field.

Top pros do far more high-intensity running. Studies show 28–58% more sprinting than average players and about an 11% edge on Yo-Yo scores (Mohr et al., 2003). Straight sprints lead to goals 45% of the time, and 83% of goals follow a powerful action (Faude et al., 2012).

  • Intermittent protocols stress both aerobic and anaerobic energy pathways.
  • They reveal how a player manages repeated efforts, quick recoveries, and mechanical changes under fatigue.
  • Field tests are cheaper and easier for coaches to run during preseason and the season (Svensson & Drust, 2005).
Approach What it shows When to use Practical note
The Mile Continuous endurance Base conditioning Misses repeat-sprint ability
Yo-Yo style Intermittent endurance & recovery Match-readiness checks High sport specificity
Interval sprints Explosive capacity & repeatability Acceleration and late-game power Easy to run on the field
Lab VO2 Metabolic precision Detailed profiling Expensive, less game-like

Soccer fitness test examples for intermittent endurance and recovery performance

Want drills that mirror the stop-start grind of a match and give clean, comparable numbers? Below are field-ready protocols that show how players handle repeated surges and short recovery windows.

yo-yo intermittent recovery

Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery (Level 1 & Level 2)

The yo-yo intermittent setup uses 2×20 m shuttles with a short active break (5 or 10 seconds) between runs. Beeps speed up, and levels rise until exhaustion.

Level 1 starts near 10 km/h and fits broader squads. Level 2 begins around 13 km/h for trained players who need a tougher pace change.

Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST)

LIST mimics match blocks: five 15-minute segments with 3-minute recovery. Each block mixes walks, a 20 m max sprint, ~4 seconds recovery, controlled runs at different intensities, all paced by audio.

FIFA Interval Tests & Futsal shuttle

FIFA Interval 1: 6×40 m sprints with 60 seconds recovery—simple and brutal for repeated high-intensity capacity.

FIFA Interval 2: Alternating 75 m run and 25 m walk for up to 10 laps (4,000 meters) to track intermittent endurance on familiar meters.

Futsal format: progressive 3×15 m shuttles until exhaustion—great for tight turns and repeated accelerations.

  • Use these protocols to compare players, set benchmarks, and target recovery-focused training.
Protocol Format What it measures Best for
Yo-Yo L1/L2 2×20 m shuttles, short active break Intermittent recovery, pacing across levels Squads & trained players
LIST Match-like blocks, audio paced Repeated sequences, recovery management Match-readiness profiling
FIFA Interval 1 6×40 m, 60 s recovery Repeated sprint capacity Speed endurance
FIFA Interval 2 / Futsal 75/25 m cycles or 3×15 m shuttles Intermittent endurance, turn quality Endurance and small-sided play

Agility and change-of-direction tests that mirror football movement

Testing change-of-direction reveals how a player moves under pressure and in tight spaces. These protocols focus on short bursts, quick reads, and clean mechanics.

FIFA CODA Test

The FIFA CODA test mixes forward sprints and lateral shuffles over 8–10 meters to assess how a player changes direction. It highlights quick decision-making in confined zones.

Balsom Agility

Balsom runs a multi-cone pattern with several direction changes and two hard 180° turns. This stresses timing, footwork, hips, and torso control under rapid cuts.

5-10-5 Pro Agility

The 5-10-5 measures lateral speed and direction change performance. It shows who can win duels, stop dribbles, and explode after a turnover.

  • Short distances, big insights: split times reveal where a player loses speed in a cut.
  • Complements sprints: these tests target braking strength and re-acceleration for game impact.
  • Easy set-up: ideal next to technical work for fluid sessions.
Protocol Focus Best use
FIFA CODA Forward + lateral, 8–10 meters Decision-making in tight space
Balsom Agility Multi-cone with 180° turns Timing and change of direction
5-10-5 Lateral speed Duels and recovery bursts

Speed and sprint tests for acceleration, curves, and repeated efforts

A short sprint can change a game. Measure both first-step punch and the ability to bend a run to see who wins duels.

speed sprint test

10-yard dash: measuring first-step acceleration and linear speed off the mark

The 10-yard dash captures the first three steps that decide who reaches the ball first. Use electronic timing for clean splits and repeatability.

Why it matters: it isolates pure acceleration and shows if your work on power is paying off across the season.

Sprint Curve Test (Bangsbo): three-direction change 30 m sprint

The Sprint Curve Test runs roughly 30 meters with three direction changes. Record the fastest sprint, average time, and a fatigue index.

What you learn: how well a player bends runs, brakes, and re-accelerates under pressure. Compare results to elite benchmarks to set targets.

  • Pair both tests for a full view: first-step pop plus curved sprint skill.
  • Run fresh for best quality; keep setup simple and repeatable.
Protocol Focus Key output
10-yard dash Acceleration Split times, first-step speed
Sprint Curve Curved sprints Fastest time, average, fatigue index

Strength and power testing to support jumps, sprints, and duels

Explosive strength underpins every header, tackle, and explosive run. Coaches need quick, reliable measures to know who is fresh and who needs rest. Two simple approaches give high return on time: the countermovement jump and velocity-based squat profiling.

Countermovement Jump (CMJ): explosive power, jump height, and fatigue insights

The CMJ is fast and telling. It measures jump height and peak power in one jump. If a player’s jump drops over days, that often signals fatigue or reduced energy.

Why use it? CMJ links to winning aerial duels and getting a quick first step off the mark. Track CMJ alongside field work to see translation to ball contests and sprint starts.

Velocity-based squat profiling: estimating 1RM, monitoring readiness, and guiding training loads

Bar-speed tools estimate 1RM without risky max attempts. They show daily readiness by tracking movement velocity at set loads. Drops in bar speed at a usual weight flag fatigue and may prevent injury.

Practical win: brief morning checks let you adjust training loads so players hit the right stimulus on the right day.

  • Quick feedback: CMJ gives instant power data so you can decide recovery needs.
  • Individualize loads: velocity profiling estimates strength and guides training.
  • Durability: regular short tests build players who finish with the same pop they start with.
Measure What it shows When to use Practical note
CMJ Jump height, explosive power, fatigue Daily or pre-session checks Fast, minimal tech; repeatable
Velocity Squat Estimated 1RM, readiness, load guidance Weekly or morning screening Reduces need for max lifts
Hip abductor screen Injury risk, soft-tissue status Preseason and after heavy blocks Pre-emptive; simple measures

Position- and role-specific testing: goalkeepers and referees

Different roles demand different bursts: goalkeepers and referees need tailored checks, not one-size protocols. Here are three role-focused options that map to real match actions and help the team prioritize the right qualities.

Yo-Yo variation for goalkeepers

What it is: A goalkeeper-focused yo-yo intermittent recovery protocol that blends side shuffles, short forward runs, and backpedals over brief meters.

This format mimics stance shifts, quick resets, and box coverage. Work intervals last only a few seconds, with short rest between reps to reflect in-game demands.

Assistant Referee Intermittent Endurance Test (ARIET)

What it is: An intermittent yo-yo-style test with alternating forward and sideways runs timed to match the last defender.

ARIET trains and measures the lateral endurance refs need along the touchline. It helps predict who keeps pace for long halves.

FIT Interval Test

What it is: Circuits over 10- and 25-yard distances with pace shifts, direction changes, and 30-second rest blocks.

This intermittent recovery test layers variable speeds and movement patterns to mimic football rhythm across levels and match seconds.

  • One size doesn’t fit all: goalkeepers need short, sharp bouts with lateral shuffles and backpedals.
  • Position-specific protocols improve buy-in and yield clearer comparisons across players.
  • Keep setups tight and repeatable; fit assessments into technical days to control load and track recovery.
Protocol Focus Best use
Keeper Yo-Yo Lateral power, short bursts Goalkeeper readiness
ARIET Sideways endurance, timing Assistant referee conditioning
FIT Interval Pace shifts, direction changes Field players and refs; match rhythm

Want to reduce injury risk while testing? Pair these role checks with recovery monitoring and simple screens — learn how to prevent and treat match injuries.

How coaches and teams can run tests on the field: timing, setup, and standards

Good testing starts with a plan: clear lanes, reliable timing, and repeatable rest windows. Keep setups simple so data stays clean. Field protocols are lower cost and easier to repeat than lab work (Svensson & Drust, 2005).

When to test in-season and preseason

Plan preseason for baselines and education. Use that time to set standards by position and age (Carling et al., 2009).

In-season, test briefly and often to track recovery and shape weekly training. Schedule sessions after rest or light days. Protect freshness—avoid stacking multiple max efforts back-to-back.

Tracking times, levels, and distances

Use KPIs that matter: Yo-Yo distance/level, sprint splits, and agility times. LIST produces block data (five 15-minute blocks with 3-minute recovery and 20 m max sprints). Yo-Yo reports total meters and level reached. FIFA intervals give defined runs (e.g., 6×40 m with 60 s rest).

  • Keep logistics tight: marked meters, consistent surface, and the same timing device.
  • Run short circuits: coaches can screen a whole team in 20–30 minutes.
  • Standardize rest: within and between drills so results reflect ability, not randomness.
Action Why When
Baseline battery Establish norms by position Preseason
Quick screen Monitor recovery and dips Weekly/in-season
Role check Position-specific standards Monthly or after heavy blocks

From test results to match impact: turning data into smarter soccer training

Turn raw numbers into actions that change match outcomes.

Link KPIs to on-field moments. Yo-Yo outcomes guide conditioning blocks. Sprint and agility splits shape short, sharp micro-sessions that protect rest and build race-winning speed.

Use CMJ and squat velocity as daily readiness reads. If jump height or bar speed drops, tweak the session before problems arise. Track direction and change-of-direction quality across the season to see real transfer to duels and ball wins.

Keep testing tight on time and meters. Communicate results simply with players so they see how a small gain in speed or endurance becomes a game-deciding edge.

Data is a conversation, not a verdict. Use it to adjust, reward progress, and prepare for the next match.

FAQ

What are the most common field tests coaches use to assess intermittent endurance?

Coaches favor shuttle and interval protocols that mimic match work. Popular choices include the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery levels, Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test, and FIFA interval formats. These use repeated runs, short active rest periods, and rising speeds to measure how well players recover between high-intensity efforts.

Why is intermittent, soccer-specific testing better than running a single timed mile?

Match play is stop-start and directional, not steady-state. Intermittent tests replicate repeated sprints, changes of direction, and brief recovery windows. That makes them more valid for predicting match performance, pacing training, and spotting players who struggle with recovery between efforts.

How does the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test work and what do Level 1 and Level 2 measure?

The Yo-Yo tests use 20-meter shuttles with beep cues and short active rest periods. Level 1 starts at a lower speed and suits general endurance. Level 2 begins faster and targets elite players with higher anaerobic demand. Scoring is distance completed before a player fails to meet the beeps twice.

What is the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST) and why use it?

LIST recreates match-like blocks: walking, jogging, running, and sprinting across set shuttles with controlled rest. It evaluates how players handle realistic work-to-rest patterns and helps coaches tailor conditioning to in-game demands.

How do FIFA Interval Tests differ from each other and when should teams pick them?

FIFA Interval Test 1 focuses on repeated 40 m sprints with about 60 seconds recovery, assessing high-intensity capacity. FIFA Interval Test 2 uses longer 75 m runs paired with 25 m walks to test sustained intermittent endurance. Choose based on whether you want to stress pure sprint repeatability or prolonged intermittent output.

Are there smaller-court or futsal-specific protocols? What about goalkeepers and referees?

Yes. The Futsal Intermittent Endurance Test uses short 3×15 m shuttles to exhaustion. Goalkeepers can do modified Yo-Yo variants emphasizing shuffles, short forward runs, and backpedals. Assistant referees use sideways-focused protocols like ARIET to mirror their match movements.

Which agility and change-of-direction drills translate best to match actions?

Multi-cone patterns and short shuttle drills are top choices. The FIFA CODA test, Balsom Agility patterns, and the 5-10-5 Pro Agility measure rapid decelerations, reaccelerations, and lateral quickness—skills used in duels, marking, and defensive recovery.

How should teams test speed and repeated sprint ability on the field?

Use short sprints to assess first-step acceleration (10-yard dash) and longer angled or curved sprints for top-speed and fatigue effects (Bangsbo sprint curve). Combine single-sprint tests with repeat-sprint protocols to gauge recovery between maximal efforts.

What strength and power measures matter most for on-field performance?

Countermovement jump (CMJ) gives quick insight into explosive leg power and neuromuscular fatigue. Velocity-based squat profiling helps estimate 1RM, track readiness, and set training loads for improving jump and sprint performance.

When is the best time to run these assessments during a season?

Test in preseason to set baselines and again periodically in-season to monitor adaptations and fatigue. Schedule sessions when players are fresh (avoid heavy training days) and allow proper recovery to limit interference with training and matches.

How do coaches record and use results to inform training? What KPIs matter?

Track distances, times, levels reached, and heart-rate or perceived effort. Key indicators include maximal distance on Yo-Yo tests, repeat-sprint decrement, CMJ height, and agility times. Use trends to individualize conditioning, adjust workloads, and prioritize recovery.

How do you set up tests safely on the field—what equipment and timing standards are needed?

Use cones for shuttles, a reliable audio beep system or timing gates, and clear markings for distances. Ensure warm-ups, medical cover, and consistent environmental conditions. Standardize instructions and rest between attempts for valid comparisons.

Can youth and recreational players use these protocols, or are they only for professionals?

Many protocols scale to different levels. Choose lower-intensity versions or Level 1 formats for youth and recreational players, and adjust rest and pacing. The goal is to measure relevant qualities without overloading less trained athletes.

How often should testing be repeated to monitor progress without causing fatigue?

For most teams, every 6–8 weeks during the season is reasonable. In preseason, more frequent checks (every 3–4 weeks) can guide rapid programming. Always coordinate with coaching loads to avoid testing when players are fatigued.

Which tests best predict match performance and quickly show training effects?

Intermittent shuttle tests (Yo-Yo, LIST) and repeat-sprint protocols have strong links to match work-rate and recovery capacity. CMJ and short-sprint measures are sensitive to neuromuscular changes after strength or speed blocks.